Cisco (Lake Herring)

Quick facts

Scientific name: Coregonus artedii

  • Once extremely productive in Green Bay, Lake Erie, and Saginaw Bay
  • Now making a comeback in Lake Superior and northern Lake Huron

Etymology and taxonomy

The genus name Coregonus means angle-eye, and artedi refers to pioneering ichthyologist Petrus Artedi. Other members of the genus Coregonus include lake whitefish, bloater chub, and five species of deepwater ciscoes that are extinct or extirpated from Lake Michigan. The cisco belongs to the same family as salmon and trout (Salmonidae). The common name “lake herring” is misleading, because it is not a member of the herring family (Clupeidae), which includes alewife and gizzard shad.

Life history

In Lake Superior, cisco mature at 9-12 inches and 2-4 years of age. They spawn as fall gives way to winter and water temperature drops to 40°F. Spawning generally occurs in the shallows of lakes over a clean bottom, although cisco also spawn in open waters of Lake Superior and in some streams.

Diet

The cisco primarily feeds on microscopic zooplankton, but aquatic insect larvae, adult mayflies and stoneflies, and other bottom-dwelling invertebrates are also eaten by adults. Being a coldwater fish, the cisco feeds heavily under the ice.

Management issues

Cisco are sometimes called the “canaries of cold water.” They do not tolerate warm water or low oxygen levels and have declined in, or disappeared from, over 20 percent of their native lakes in Michigan.

Development and other land use changes can lead to increases in the nutrient phosphorus. Increased nutrient levels accelerate plant and algae growth, which in turn drives greater decomposition below the thermocline of stratified lakes, depleting oxygen required for cisco to thrive. Inland lakes that do retain high water quality are often stocked with trout, which also require cold oxygenated water, or other gamefish. Stocking predators or competitors is also recognized as the cause of cisco decline in some inland lakes.

Importance to fishery

The cisco is one of the few species that is sought by recreational anglers and commercial fishers, in addition to being an important forage fish. Cisco are taken by commercial fisheries in Lake Superior and Lake Huron’s North Channel, and popular recreational fisheries exist on the St. Marys River and certain inland lakes. Teardrop jigs and small baits like waxworms or wigglers are effective through the ice and in open water. Fly fishing can be effective during the Hex hatch (annual mayfly emergence).

With soft fins, fatty meat, and ideal size, the cisco makes a perfect prey fish. One study from Ontario found that walleye grew more efficiently, required fewer meals, and expended less energy in inland lakes with cisco as the major forage fish. Northern pike and lake trout also prey heavily on cisco where they are available.

Cisco Restoration in Lake Michigan

Lead Project Investigator: Sara Adlerstein

The research team will use existing data and guided discussions to help stakeholders create a path for cisco restoration in Lake Michigan.

Drawing from existing publications, reports, and databases, the team will pool information about food web dynamics, rearing methods, fishery regulations, and other relevant topics. They will present this information at regular meetings held by charter fishing associations, regional fishery regulators, and Lake Michigan ecosystem managers. The team also will distribute an electronic survey to key stakeholders involved in, or likely affected by, future cisco management decisions. The survey will allow stakeholders to convey and explain their preferred options for restoration actions.

The compiled research material and survey responses will provide a comprehensive launching point for a pair of stakeholder workshops, which will be the centerpiece of the project. The workshops will introduce participants to the integrated assessment process, deliver compiled background information, identify remaining data gaps, and review restoration strategies and lessons from other fisheries. Then, the research team will facilitate interactive discussions aimed at selecting preferred restoration options and clarifying major considerations embedded in each option. By the end of the workshop, the participants will either agree on a recommended course of action, or identify roots of disagreement that will need to be addressed before recommendations can be made.

Publications

Project Team

Principal Investigator

Sara Adlerstein
Associate Research Scientist
School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan
(734) 764-4491
adlerste@umich.edu

Co-Investigators

Julia Wondolleck
Associate Professor
University of Michigan
(734) 764-1570
juliaw@umich.edu

Michael Wiley
Professor of Aquatic Ecology
University of Michigan
(734) 647-2022
mjwiley@umich.edu

David Clapp
Research Station Director
Michigan Department of
Natural Resources
(231) 547-2914
ClappD@michigan.gov

Randy Claramunt
Fisheries Biologist
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
(231) 547-2914
ClaramuntR@michigan.gov

Jory Jonas
Fisheries Research Biologist Specialist
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
(231) 547-2914, Ext. 229
JonasJ@Michigan.gov

Sea Grant Extension Educators

Daniel O’Keefe
Southwest Michigan 
(616) 994-4580
okeefed@msu.edu